This new book is a useful compilation of a lot of available evidence on this subject. Next time you hear somebody say "There is no connection between homosexuality and paedophilia," you can have all the facts ready. Just consult this handy A-Z. From Auden to Pasolini, from Oscar Wilde to Gore Vidal, most famous gays were paedophiles. and so were all the founders and leaders of the "Gay" Rights movement.
Who says so? Well in most cases they did. Here is the evidence. It gives you the names, the dates and the sources to prove that the correlation is very strong and undeniable. The LGBT movement has always been a paedophile movement and its object is to destroy the family.
In this installment, we give you the Introduction.
Demographics are the key to understanding this subject and all arguments stand or fall on whether they have taken demographics properly into account. Personal opinions and anecdotes are too often relied on by those who try to deny the truth. In deciding whether there is a correlation between homosexuality and paedophilia, we need to take into account that homosexuals are a very small percentage of the population. In the UK they are officially 1.5% (figures from Office for National Statistics). Male homosexuals are approximately 1%. Even if you think they are 3 or 4%, that is still far less than the percentage of child sex crimes they commit.
It is something very recent for anyone to
deny the links between male homosexuality and paedophilia. Nobody made any
secret of it over the last 2,500 years, and even the early LGBT movement in
America and Europe was very frank in acknowledging it. Only in recent times
have they started to deny it, or to be exact, to issue a confused mixture of
angry, hypocritical denial with defiant justification. When no moralists (called
“right-wingers”) are around, they will acknowledge it and boast about it. When
moralists object, the LGBTs resort to bare-faced lies.
Nobody could write a full account of this
subject, unless they were willing to devote their life to a topic that is
monotonous and unsavoury, to say the least. All I have done is compile a rough
index of some of the most salient evidence for the correlation between homosexuality and paedophilia.
Our culture habitually turns a blind eye
to this problem and minimizes it. Boys are told not to "make a fuss".
They are not regarded as having suffered any serious harm and the man who has a
taste for pederasty is often still classified as an eccentric, not a criminal.
In his biography of Oscar Wilde, Richard Ellman makes light of the evidence for
Wilde being a paedophile and molester of boys. This attitude goes back a long time
in history. Traditionally, if a girl was raped, her value in the marriage
market was lost or reduced. Without her virginity she was damaged goods,
and if she were made pregnant, her chances of marriage would be nil. Therefore
raping a woman was recognized as a serious offence. A boy victim of “forcible
buggery” (nowadays commonly referred to as rape) was expected to shut up and
say nothing as he couldn't get pregnant. I will use the abbreviation FB for
forcible buggery as it is important to keep the distinction between different
physical acts. In the film “Four Weddings and a Funeral” child abuse at British boarding schools is made into a joke, “Buggered me senseless!” Ha-ha. Next moment we are
back to the nauseating denials.
Many of the most prolific paedophiles are homosexual. Jimmy Savile and Peter Jaconelli were homosexual lovers.
Since this crime is so under-reported and
often undocumented, we have to suspect that it is far more widespread than the
available evidence reveals. Police figures for sexual assaults suggest 21% of
victims are boys, more than ten times the proportion of homosexual men in the
population. Yet these figures only represent convictions and the crime is
under-reported. [http://www.christianvoice.org.uk/index.php/links-between-homosexuality-and-child-molestation/] If you go and look at the
website UK Paedos Exposed you will find that the number of male offenders who
molest male victims is at least half of all cases. When you consider the ratio
and the proportion, these figures are startling. Since homosexuals are
according to the Office of National Statistics only 1.5% of the population and
some of them are women, this indicates that male homosexuals are about fifty
times more likely than heterosexuals are to molest children . Even if you assume
that homosexual men are 3% of the population and that only a third of cases
involve boys, the maths still lead us to a conclusion that homosexual men are
ten times more likely than heterosexuals to molest children. http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/
Just look at the bare facts - out of the
thirty paedophile organization listed in Wikipedia as campaigning to legalize
adult-child sex in the 20th century, 28 were founded and run by male
homosexuals. The movement has been entirely dominated by male homosexuals. None
were purely heterosexual.
And there are many more paedophile groups
and magazines not listed on Wikipedia, all of them set up by homosexuals,
mostly men.
If we merely glance at the Wikipedia
entry on paedophile activism we find that all but one of the individuals
involved in it are homosexual males.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Pedophile_activism
A constant stream of evidence confirms that paedophiles have
a strong preference for one sex or another. This totally contradicts the
current fashionable view. The LGBT dogmatists often publicly deny any link between
homosexuality and paedophilia. They have trained the heterosexual liberals to
repeat this, like dogs trained to sit up and beg. What is their method of
argument? When you find an example of an adult male raping and molesting boys,
you categorize him as a paedophile "not as a homosexual". Er...yes,
that's their logic. That is their “science”. They are in complete denial.
Another knee-jerk reaction is to dismiss
research they don't like by calling it "right-wing" and label the
scientists a "hate-group". That is not a method of argument. It is
censorship. Another word for it might be Lysenko-ism, the prioritizing of
ideology over scientific enquiry. It is simply false to claim that there is no connection between homosexuality and paedophilia. It is nonsense.
Here is an example of how British liberals argue their science: an article
in the Independent newspaper for August 1st 1997 reported a piece of research
done in Brisbane, Australia that had concluded that there were strong
correlations between male homosexuality and paedophilia. Instead of being taken
into account with respect and open-mindedness, the research was reported (by a
gay activist) in a contemptuous manner and ridiculed. The gay activist's idea
of scientific argument was to say that his partner had vomited on the article
(sic). He then went on to compare the researcher to Helen Keller, a comparison
that was downright offensive.
The
news media in the UK continues to be willfully blinkered on this subject. It
avoids reporting major scandals such as the Scottish Stonewall Paedophile ring
and edits out the factual links between the criminals and the prominent LGBT
groups. When reporting the North Wales Child Abuse scandal, the TV news always
used the word “paedophiles” although this was all about the organized abuse of
boys by men. The TV reportage omitted the fact that the abuse had been
organised by a network of members of CHE, The Campaign for Homosexual Equality. Likewise, TV coverage of the crimes of James Rennie,
John Murphy and co, omitted any reference to the fact that they were Stonewall
officials, paid by the government and registered as a charity. In a similar fashion, the western media habitually refer to all the
sexual abuse reported in the Catholic Church as being “paedophile”. What they
do not admit is that virtually all of it is homosexual. When in 2003 British
police discovered an international paedophile ring calling itself “The Shadows
Brotherhood” making and distributing thousands of child pornographic videos of a
“horrific” nature, with 45 suspects involved, media avoided mentioning the sex
of any of the children involved.
(http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/05/24/exlocal_councillor_gets_two_years/)
They avoid making any link between (a) homosexual activists campaigning openly to abolish the age of consent, and (b) men who are caught sodomizing boys. They call the second category “paedophiles” even if they are actually pederasts, which is one of the commonest types of homosexual. Some homosexuals assert that all homosexual men are pederasts at heart. Most paedophiles have a strong sexual preference, and those who are male and homosexual usually have relations with adults as well as with children or adolescents.
They avoid making any link between (a) homosexual activists campaigning openly to abolish the age of consent, and (b) men who are caught sodomizing boys. They call the second category “paedophiles” even if they are actually pederasts, which is one of the commonest types of homosexual. Some homosexuals assert that all homosexual men are pederasts at heart. Most paedophiles have a strong sexual preference, and those who are male and homosexual usually have relations with adults as well as with children or adolescents.
Over the past thirty years there has been
abundant research confirming the prevalence of child sex abuse by homosexual
men. But the powerful LGBT lobby is suppressing it and circulating fallacies. Yet their own publications frequently confirm a correlation between
homosexuality and child abuse. A survey in The Advocate, an American homosexual magazine, (23rd August 1994, p.20) revealed that half its male readers had their first homosexual experience by the age of fourteen, and 21% had been molested by an older man by age 15. They assert this is no higher than average for heterosexuals. A 1992 study of 1000 homosexuals found even higher figures: 37% had been abused sexually by an older male. (Socarides, Homosexuality: A Freedom Too Far, p. 88)
Project Sigma, a Sociological
Study into Gay Men and AIDS done at Essex University by Prof. Anthony P. M. Coxon, Thomas J. McManus of the Royal London
Hospital and John K. Stevens of the
University of Essex, published in 1996, found that 9% of homosexual men had their first homosexual experience
by the age of 10, 19% percent by the age of 12, and 35% by the age of 14. This
is significantly lower than among the heterosexual majority. The research was
based on the statements and diaries of 2,182 homosexual males gathered between
1987 and 1994. (Anthony P.M.
Coxon, Thomas J. McManus, and John K. Stevens, “Concentration of High-risk
Sexual Behaviour Among Gay Men,” paper presented at the World Aids Congress,
Vancouver, Canada, June 1996.)
In 1985, data compiled by the Family
Research Institute, Washington D.C., confirmed “a strong pedophilic
predisposition among homosexuals." The institute, after reviewing more
than 19 studies and peer-reviewed reports in a 1985 "Psychological
Reports" article, found that homosexuals account for between 25 and 40
percent of all child molestation. “But
this number is low, due to the fact that many reporters will not report if a
child molester is a homosexual, even if he knows that to be the case.” One
notorious offender in the USA molested more than 500 boys. The idea that
paedophiles have no gender preference and therefore cannot be categorized as
homosexual or heterosexual is a myth.
http://www.momaroo.com/755632429/sex-offenders-registry---yes-or-no/
A further study was carried out for the FRC by Dr Timothy Daily and published in 2002. It confirmed everything that the 1985 study had shown. The report, entitled Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse, showed that while homosexual men make up less than three per cent of the adult male population, they commit a disproportionate number (one third or more) of child sexual molestations. Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse presents a number of controversial findings. The first is that a significant percentage of child sexual abuse victims are boys. The second finding of Dailey's report contradicts the "inaccurate but widely accepted claims of sex researcher Alfred Kinsey" that homosexuals comprise at least 10 per cent of the population. Based upon a study of three large data sets, the General Social Survey, the National Health and Social Life Survey, and the U.S. Census, "a recent study in demography estimates the number of exclusive male homosexuals in the general population at 2.5 per cent, and the number of exclusive lesbians at 1.4 per cent," writes Dailey.
Homosexuality and Child Sexual
Abuse correctly points out that paedophiles
have long existed as a subculture within the gay rights movement. Dailey quotes
David Thorstad, a homosexual activist and founding member of NAMBLA, to
demonstrate that by 1985, pedophilia had gained acceptance within the
homosexual movement, as it was in that year that NAMBLA was admitted as a member in New
York's council of Lesbian and Gay Organizations and the International Gay
Association. In the words of Jim Kepner, at one time the curator of the
International Gay and Lesbian Archives in Los Angeles: “A point I've been trying to make is that if we
reject the boylovers in our midst today, we'd better stop waving the banner of
the ancient Greeks, of Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Oscar Wilde, Walt
Whitman, Horatio Alger, and Shakespeare. We'd better stop claiming them as part
of our history unless we are broadening our concept of what it means to be
gay.”
The research of G.G. Abel, M.Mittleman,
and J.V.Becker et al., also published in 1985, indicated that of all types of
paedophile, the male who molests boys is the most active, having far more
victims than the average heterosexual offender and molesting them more
repeatedly: “non-incestuous pedophiles who molest boys had committed an average
of 282 offenses against 150 victims” [(“Sexual Offender: Results of Assessment
and Recommendations for Treatment”, in Ben-Aron, Hucker and Webster, eds., Clinical Criminology.
Toronto. M and M
Graphics, 1985), see also “Self-Reported crimes of non-incarcerated
paraphiliacs”, Journal of Interpersonal Violence vol 2 1987]
Abel found that homosexuals
"sexually molest young boys with an incidence that is occurring from five
times greater than the molestation of girls. …" and he found that
non-incarcerated "child molesters admitted from 23.4 to 281.7 acts per
offender … whose targets were males." He concluded that the typical homosexual pederast abused 150.2 boys while heterosexual had only an average of 19.8 victims.
In his book Physical Abusers and Sexual Offenders: Forensic and Clinical Strategies, (CRC Press, 13 July 2006, p.292) Scott Allen Johnson notes the work of Abel et al. that revealed that “non-incarcerated sex offenders molest young boys at a significantly higher rate than young girls.” It added, “Arrest records are grossly inadequate sources of the types of sexually deviant and sexually violent sex offenders engage in” (Frisbie and Dondis, 1965). Moreover, sex offenders molesting boys were far more likely to have large numbers of victims than sex offenders molesting a female.” (G. G. Abel and C. Osborne , “The Paraphilias: The Extent and Nature of Sexually deviant Criminal Behaviour”, in Bradford, ed, Psychiatric Clinics of North America vol 15(3) pub. Saunders, Philadelphia 1992, pp 675-687)
In 2008, researchers
from the Center for Disease Control
and Prevention, the national public health institute of the
United States, published further data showing that homosexual men are “at
least three times more likely to report CSA (childhood sexual abuse).” They
find the rates of childhood sexual abuse (which they abbreviate as CSA) for men
who have sex with men range from 11.8% to 37.0%, and note that “the
best-designed studies tend to converge on CSA prevalence of 15% to
25%.” While most of those who perpetrate sexual abuse are men, abusers are
not necessarily homosexual or gay-identified, and the authors note that
“in studies focusing on MSM, the perpetrators are 90% male.” The range of
abuse varies in the different studies depending on the definition of abuse and
the sample method. The researchers report that the rates of child sexual abuse
for homo- or bisexual-identified men are significantly higher than those found
among heterosexually-identified men. They write that the rates for
heterosexual men are usually “less than 10%,” and state that in five studies
that compared the two groups, the homosexuals are “at least three times more
likely to report CSA, however defined, than heterosexual men.” This
finding is reiterated in their conclusion: “Rates for MSM are 15% to 25% in the
best designed studies, which is at least triple the rates reported among
heterosexual men.” Some of the persistent emotional struggles reported by men who
experienced CSA include anger and rage, betrayal and loss, intense fear,
helplessness and loss of control, sexual identity confusion and struggle with
masculinity, isolation and alienation, lack of belief in the legitimacy of both
the abuse and the after-effects, enduring negative beliefs about self and
others, repressed or compulsive sexuality, shame, and humiliation. They
add “The fact that most childhood abusers of MSM were males suggests either an
etiological link between CSA and adult sexual orientation, or the existence of
childhood characteristics that are related to adult sexual orientation in men
that increase vulnerability, or both.” They list some of the
outcomes associated with childhood sexual abuse, including “sexual
compulsivity;” “shame, guilt, and a long-standing uncertainty about sexual
orientation;” “sexual identity confusion and struggle with masculinity;” “more
lifetime sexual partners;” “increased risk for depression and partner violence”
and “more sexual risk behavior and higher prevalence of HIV infection.”
Their sources are David W. Purcell, Jocelyn D. Patterson and Pilgrim S. Spikes,
Jr., “Childhood Sexual Abuse Experienced by Gay and Bisexual Men: Understanding
the Disparities and Interventions to Help Eliminate Them,” in Richard J.
Wolitski, Ron Stall, and Ronald O Valdiserri, eds., Unequal Opportunity,
(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 72-96.
The research of Tomeo et al., revealed in 2001 that nearly half of all “gay”-identified men who participated in research were molested by a homosexual pedophile: “46 percent of homosexual men and 22 percent of homosexual women reported having been molested by a person of the same gender. This contrasts to only 7 percent of heterosexual men and 1 percent of heterosexual women reporting having been molested by a person of the same gender.” The study was based on a non-clinical population of 465. (M. Tomeo, D. Templar, S. Anderson, and D. Kotler, “Comparative Data of Childhood and Adolescence Molestation in Heterosexual and Homosexual Persons.” Archives of Sexual Behavior Vol. 30 (3), 2001, pp. 535-541.)
The research of Tomeo et al., revealed in 2001 that nearly half of all “gay”-identified men who participated in research were molested by a homosexual pedophile: “46 percent of homosexual men and 22 percent of homosexual women reported having been molested by a person of the same gender. This contrasts to only 7 percent of heterosexual men and 1 percent of heterosexual women reporting having been molested by a person of the same gender.” The study was based on a non-clinical population of 465. (M. Tomeo, D. Templar, S. Anderson, and D. Kotler, “Comparative Data of Childhood and Adolescence Molestation in Heterosexual and Homosexual Persons.” Archives of Sexual Behavior Vol. 30 (3), 2001, pp. 535-541.)
Diane Shrier and Robert L. Johnson found in
1988 that boys who had been sexually abused are seven times more likely to
identify as homosexual or bisexual than their heterosexual counterparts. And
this was gold-standard, peer-reviewed research. (“Sexual Victimization of Boys:
An Ongoing Study of an Adolescent Medicine Clinic Population,” Journal of the National Medical Association 80).
Richard C. Friedman
and Jennifer I Downey discovered in 2009 that the boys who later identified as
heterosexual had a mean average of 15.7 as the time of their first sexual
experience. For the boy who later identified as homosexual, the mean average
was 12.7. “Homosexuality,” The New England Journal
of Medicine, vol. #331 (1994): 923-930, (27 April 2009) <http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/331/14/923>
Similar patterns and
statistics are offered by researchers who deny that premature sexual activity
is undesirable or harmful. Dr Bruce Rind, a psychologist at Temple University,
Philadelphia, found that a very high percentage of homosexual and bisexual men have boyhood
sexual encounters with older men. (“Gay and Bisexual Adolescent Boys' Sexual
Experiences With Men: An Empirical Examination of Psychological Correlates
in a Nonclinical Sample”, Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 30, No.4, 2001.
http://www.just-well.dk/rind.htmInternational Academy of Sex
Research)
Homosexualities: A Study of Diversity
Among Men and Women (Simon and Schuster
1978) by Alan P. Bell and Martin S. Weinberg, reports that 25 percent of
homosexual men admit to having had sexual relations with boys who are 16 or
under. Their figures come from the Institute of Sex Research.
This is
particularly worrying since findings
published in the Journal of the American Medical Association show that 50
percent of male AIDS victims reported sexual relations with an adult male by
the age of 16, and 20 percent of male AIDS victims had sexual relations with an
adult male by age 10. In other words, early molestation is an open door to a
life of promiscuity and disease.
Homosexual Behavior & Pedophilia is an academic paper of 31 pages by Frank V. York and Robert H. Knight, published by the Family Research Council in the US in 2000. They write observantly, “Although most homosexual activists publicly deny that they want access to boys, many homosexual groups around the world are working aggressively to lower the age of sexual consent. Their cause is being aided by the professional psychiatric and psychological associations, which have moved in recent years toward normalizing pedophilia, much as they did with homosexuality in the early 1970s.” They present a wide range of very strong evidence for their case.
This
is true. Under pressure from the LGBT movement, the American Psychiatric Association
removed pedophilia from its list of sexual perversions in 1994, while in 1999
the American Psychological Association published a report, "A
Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using
College Samples," which "claimed child sexual abuse could be harmless
and beneficial".
In 2011, Professor Mark Regnerus of
University of Texas at Austin, carried out a study published in the Journal of
Family Research. Using a new, “gold standard” data set of nearly 3,000 randomly
selected American young adults, Regnerus looked at their lives on 40 measures
of social, emotional and relationship outcomes. Regnerus's research concluded
that children brought up by homosexuals are more likely to be sexually abused
and the source of his information was the children themselves, questioned in
later life. The reason is obvious: because they were mixing in circles where
paedophile activity is very prevalent and morals are very scarce. When Regnerus’s
research was published, homo-extremists tried to get him dismissed from his job
at the university. There was a formal enquiry into “misconduct” which
fortunately cleared him.
http://chronicle.com/article/An-Academic-Auto-da-F-/133107/
One of the world’s leading experts on this subject is
psychologist Dr. Judith Reisman, a researcher at
Regent University, USA. Reisman was the principal investigator for an $800,000
Justice Department grant studying child pornography and violence. According to her
article Crafting "Gay" Children: An Inquiry, between 1-2 million gay males (2% of
the adult male population of 90 million) abuse 6-8 million boys. The ratio is
3-5 boy victims to one gay male compared to one girl victim per eleven straight
males. This is based on data from 33 million boys and 32 million girls under the
age of 18. It is by far the largest-scale and most objective piece of academic
research ever carried out on this subject. Reisman says that since 100% of gay
males do not sexually assault boys, the 2% homosexual population harbors a vast
pederast subculture committing multiple repeated child sex offences. In a study
of advertisements in the influential homosexual newspaper, The Advocate, Reisman found advertisements
for a "Penetrable Boy Doll … available in three provocative positions”.
She also found that the number of erotic boy images in each issue of The Advocate averaged 14. She noted that
homosexual newspapers and travel publications advertise prominently for
countries where boy prostitution is widespread, such as Burma, the Philippines,
Sri Lanka and Thailand.
(Regent University Law Review http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/regent.pdf)
Michael Munson of Hard Places Community is
an American who has worked rescuing children exploited for sex tourism in
Cambodia. He reports that boys are targeted as often as girls, and Ruth
Elliott, founder of Daughters of Cambodia, agrees. “In Ethiopia, Brazil,
Peru, India and other sex-tourism hot spots, boys are as likely as girls to be
victimized by travelling sexual predators. Some research even suggests that
boys are more likely to be exploited.”
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Part+Four+Boys+forgotten+victims+with+video/6350524/story.html
A second
more recent study agrees that boys are frequently ignored as victims of sex trafficking. “Males remain a largely
invisible population within the dialogue on sex trafficking. According to a
2008 study by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, done in New York, boys comprised about
50 percent of sexually exploited children, with most being domestic victims. The mainstream media and well-intentioned but misinformed
or inadequately trained professionals within the counter-trafficking movement
have perpetuated the image of a young, foreign, female victim. Experts say that
the law enforcement’s attitudes toward male victims are still weighed down by
gender biases in trafficking discourse, which pins females as victims and males
as perpetrators. Therefore, male victims in custody often fall through the
cracks of services that could be offered to help them because they are not
properly assessed for sexual exploitation.” This mass prostitution of boys to
men in the USA is the hidden, ugly face of homosexuality.
In 2001, Californian Assemblyman Steve Baldwin,
who is the executive director of the Council for National Policy in Washington,
D.C. published a paper called "Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement,"
(Regent University Law Review. Volume 14, 267. (2001-2002)) www.regent.edu/acad/schlaw/student_life/studentorgs/lawreview/docs/issues/v14n2/Vol.%2014,%20No.%202,%203%20Baldwin.pdf)
Baldwin correctly drew attention to the
ratio element in analyzing statistics, and to the problem of media bias,
concluding that child molestation and pedophilia occur far more commonly among
homosexuals than among heterosexuals on a per capita basis. He gathers data that "confirms
that homosexuals molest children at a rate vastly higher than heterosexuals,
and the mainstream homosexual culture commonly promotes sex with
children."
"The editorial board of the leading pedophile academic
journal, Paidika, is dominated by prominent
homosexual scholars such as San Francisco State University professor John
DeCecco, who happens to edit the Journal of Homosexuality," Baldwin wrote.
A 1988 study detailed in Baldwin's report found that most
pedophiles even consider themselves to be "gay." According to the
study, in "Archives of Sexual Behavior," some 86 percent of
pedophiles described themselves as homosexual or bisexual. Also, the study
found, the number of teenage male prostitutes who identify as homosexuals has
risen from 10 percent to 60 percent in the past 15 years.
Inevitably he was attacked and pilloried
by the LGBT movement. Baldwin replied, "For them to say this theory is
false is to call many of the homosexual movement's leaders liars. Most of my
evidence comes right from the gay community….
"I managed to find enough evidence that my thesis –
child molestation is an integral part of the homosexual movement – is a valid
thesis," Baldwin told WorldNetDaily.
"Research on the homosexual lifestyle confirms it is
almost exclusively a youth-oriented culture," Baldwin writes. Some
homosexuals focus on teenage boys, some on prepubescent boys, and many cross
over between categories.
Jay Heavener, spokesman for PFLAG –
Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, responded with denial,
saying that federal crime data refute claims that homosexuals molest children
at higher rates than heterosexuals. "According to data from the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI), this claim is false," he told WND by
e-mail. "The gay and lesbian community calls into question any dubious
research which flies in the face of our own experience." And Gary
Schoener, a clinical psychologist who has been diagnosing and treating clergy
abuse for 28 years, told Salon.com, "There are far more heterosexual cases
than homosexual."
This term “cases” is vague and confused. Does he mean numbers of offenders or numbers of victims? If he is talking about numbers of victims, that is not true and furthermore he is completely failing to take demographics and ratio into account, so his argument is worthless. It’s like saying Switzerland is not a mountainous country because there are mountains elsewhere in the world. But the fact remains that Switzerland is a tiny country and has a remarkably high number of very high mountains for its area.
In terms of numbers of victims, the cases involving boys are far higher than is generally admitted, possibly half of all cases. In terms of numbers of offenders, there is a built-in fallacy as homosexual paedophiles typically have far more victims than heterosexual ones. The ratio factor has to be taken into account before we make sense of any statistics, and furthermore the data of the police are very questionable. Boy molestation is under-reported or reported in a gender-neutral way that conceals its true nature. Some figures are shown here below in the A-Z index of evidence under C for Catholic Church.
Even if the figures were 50:50 heterosexual:homosexual, when we consider that homosexuals are such a small minority of the population, 1.5%, such figures would still reveal far more paedophile activity within that tiny sector that in a comparable percentage of the heterosexual population. The ratio factor has to be taken into account before we make sense of any statistics, and furthermore the data of the police are very questionable. Boy molestation is under-reported or reported in a gender-neutral way that conceals its true nature.
This term “cases” is vague and confused. Does he mean numbers of offenders or numbers of victims? If he is talking about numbers of victims, that is not true and furthermore he is completely failing to take demographics and ratio into account, so his argument is worthless. It’s like saying Switzerland is not a mountainous country because there are mountains elsewhere in the world. But the fact remains that Switzerland is a tiny country and has a remarkably high number of very high mountains for its area.
In terms of numbers of victims, the cases involving boys are far higher than is generally admitted, possibly half of all cases. In terms of numbers of offenders, there is a built-in fallacy as homosexual paedophiles typically have far more victims than heterosexual ones. The ratio factor has to be taken into account before we make sense of any statistics, and furthermore the data of the police are very questionable. Boy molestation is under-reported or reported in a gender-neutral way that conceals its true nature. Some figures are shown here below in the A-Z index of evidence under C for Catholic Church.
Even if the figures were 50:50 heterosexual:homosexual, when we consider that homosexuals are such a small minority of the population, 1.5%, such figures would still reveal far more paedophile activity within that tiny sector that in a comparable percentage of the heterosexual population. The ratio factor has to be taken into account before we make sense of any statistics, and furthermore the data of the police are very questionable. Boy molestation is under-reported or reported in a gender-neutral way that conceals its true nature.
Baldwin says evidence he examined
disproves the assertion that child molestation is more prevalent among
heterosexuals. Both he and Reisman found that media coverage of adult
homosexual abuse of minors is slanted. “The National Lesbian and Gay
Journalists Association (NLGJA) recently boasted that although homosexuals are
less than two percent of the population, three-fourths of the people who decide
the content of the front page of the New York Times are homosexual,"
Reisman wrote.
That one fact is especially noteworthy, experts point out,
given the recent child sex scandals taking place within the American Catholic
church. A survey by WorldNetDaily of recent news reports found that rarely did
the media describe priestly sexual abuse as "homosexual" or
"gay" activity – even though the majority involved
male-to-male contact, and a spate of investigative reports has revealed that the
Vatican is concerned about an upsurge of homosexuals in seminary schools
throughout the world. Much of the
evidence listed in this book's alphabetical Index indicates that homosexual men deliberately take
positions in schools, care-homes, boy scout troops and other institutions where
they can get access to young boys.
The investigative journalist Nick Davies, who has made a long term study of sex abuse in Britain, and written articles for The Guardian and other national newspapers, now has his own website. He argues that sex abuse is organized, collusive and endemic, happening on a “vast scale”. The evidence he brings shows that homosexual men are at the centre of the problem and abuse most prolifically and most aggressively. Moreover they are working within the system to legalize what they are doing. He writes, “This vast scale appears to be confirmed by “prevalence studies” which take samples of the population and establish how many were childhood victims of sexual abuse. In the UK, the United States, Germany, Switzerland and Australia, studies consistently find that around 20% of women and around 8% of men suffered sexual abuse as children.”
If we accept those figures, then the one per cent of homosexual men in the population molest four per cent. That makes four victims per male homosexual. Meanwhile the forty-nine per cent of heterosexual men molest ten percent, making approximately 0.2 victims per male heterosexual. Conclusion: a homosexual is twenty times more likely to abuse children. Davies finds that the homosexuals, who are persistently campaigning and lobbying to abolish the age of consent, have also systematicall infiltrated schools, care-homes and social services to ensure they can get what they want unhindered by “bigotry”. Davies is under no illusion that CSA is harmless, or that most victims "consent". It causes physical injury, disease and emotional trauma, often leading to long-term damage. And it is simply wrong.
If we accept those figures, then the one per cent of homosexual men in the population molest four per cent. That makes four victims per male homosexual. Meanwhile the forty-nine per cent of heterosexual men molest ten percent, making approximately 0.2 victims per male heterosexual. Conclusion: a homosexual is twenty times more likely to abuse children. Davies finds that the homosexuals, who are persistently campaigning and lobbying to abolish the age of consent, have also systematicall infiltrated schools, care-homes and social services to ensure they can get what they want unhindered by “bigotry”. Davies is under no illusion that CSA is harmless, or that most victims "consent". It causes physical injury, disease and emotional trauma, often leading to long-term damage. And it is simply wrong.
Much of the research has
been concerned with trying to establish whether CSA makes people become
homosexual. In 1995 Dr. Thomas Schmidt wrote, “Nevertheless, it is
disturbing to find that although under 4 percent of boys are molested by men, a
recent major study found that the rate of childhood molestation by men among
homosexual or bisexual men was nearly ten times that (35 percent). It is
also notable that 75 percent of homosexual men report their first homosexual
experience prior to the age of sixteen, as compared to 22 percent of
heterosexual men reporting their first heterosexual experience.” Straight and Narrow? (Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity
Press, 1995) p. 148, referring to J. M. Siegal, et al., “The Prevalence of
Childhood Sexual Assault,” American Journal of Epidemiology 126
(December, 1986): 1141-1153. Also to L.S. Doll, et al, “Self-Reported Childhood
and Adolescent Sexual Abuse Among Adult Homosexual and Bisexual
Men,’ Child Abuse and Neglect 16, (1992), p. 855-64; and to D.P.
McWhirter and A. M. Mattison, The Male Couple: How
Relationships Develop (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prengice-Hall, 1984),
pp, 269 and 271.
In 2000, Drs. Stanton
Jones and Mark Yarhouse analyzed data from what is probably the best survey of
sexual behavior in America. They write, “Experience of sexual abuse as a child,
in other words, more than tripled the likelihood of later reporting homosexual
orientation.” They continue, “Other studies have reported the same
trend.” Dr. Stanton L. Jones and Dr. Mark A Yarhouse, Homosexuality: The Use of Scientific Research in the Church’s Moral
Debate, (Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2000) p. 57;
referring to Edward O. Laumann, John H. Gagnon, Robert T. Michael and Stuart
Michaels, The Social Organization of Sexuality:
Sexual Practices in the United States, (Chicago University of
Chicago Press, 1994), table 9.14, p. 344.
Professor Elizabeth Wells, a researcher based in the Department
of Public Health and General Practice at the University of Otago, New Zealand, analysed
data about sexual orientation and home life gathered as part of a major New
Zealand mental health survey carried out in 2003 and 2004. Wells found that
people who identify themselves as homosexual or bisexual, or who have had a
same-sex encounter or relationship, tend to come from more disturbed
backgrounds. Information extracted from 13,000 face-to-face interviews clearly
showed those with same-sexual or bisexual orientation were more likely to have
experienced molestation in childhood. People who had experienced violence or
sexual abuse as children were three times more likely to identity themselves as
homosexual or bisexual than those who had not experienced abuse. Also, the more
often someone experienced abuse in childhood, the more likely they were to
belong to one of the “non-exclusively heterosexual” groups.
Associations between adverse events and
sexuality group were found for sexual assault, rape, violence to the child and
for witnessing violence in the home. Other adverse events, such as the sudden
death of a loved one, serious childhood illness or accident, were only slightly
associated with non-heterosexual identity or behaviour. Prof Wells said there
was no way of knowing from her study why there was a link between negative
events in childhood and same-sex sexual orientation.“We took a life-course approach, looking at where people had come from
and where they have got to. But there was no opportunity to ask people why they
[identified as homosexual or bisexual] and whether they thought that was linked
to their childhood experiences.” (“Sexual orientation link to past: study”
reviewed in Otago Daily Times Online News : Otago, South Island, New Zealand
& International News. See http://www.odt.co.nz/campus/university-otago/117336/sexual-orientation-link-past-study)
Dr
Dean Byrd, M.D. Ph.D, was elected in 2007 as the President of NARTH for 2008.
Byrd received his Ph.D. in psychology from Brigham Young University,
a post-doctoral degree in Child and Family Psychology from Virginia Commonwealth
University and Medical College of Virginia,
and a post-doctoral degree in Behavioral Medicine from Loyola University, Chicago.
He received an M.P.H. and
an M.B.A.from the University of Utah
and a diploma in forensic medicine.[11]
Byrd
served as the Director of Clinical Training for LDS Social Services,
was a Clinical Professor at Brigham Young University,
and was, at the time of his death, a Clinical Professor at the University of Utah,
School of Medicine, with appointments in the Department of Family and
Preventive Medicine and in Department of Psychiatry, with an adjunct clinical
appointment in the Department of Family Studies. As member of the faculty at
the University of Utah, he lectured medical students about disparities
in health care in the population. He was a member of the American Psychological
Association, the Utah
Psychological Association where he served on the
Governing Board, with professional affiliations in the American Orthopsychiatric Association,
where he was a fellow, the American Public Health
Association, the American Board of Forensic Examiners and
the Prescribing Psychologist Register. He was a former member of the Evergreen Board of Trustees;
President of Thrasher
Research Fund, a pediatric research granting institution;
and had visiting professor appointments in Israel and Poland. Byrd also had
training in genetics, biochemistry and neurochemistry from the University of California at
Berkeley.” (Wikipedia) Despite all of that, his views on
homosexuality are scorned by LGBT activists because they do not conform to LGBT
dogma. People with no credentials themselves dismiss his research and call
NARTH a “hate-group”.
In 2009 Byrd said, “There is an
interesting problem with the research – we have been asking the wrong question
for many years. If you ask men if they were sexually abused, many will say
“no,” because allowing oneself to be sexually abused is incompatible with
masculinity. However, if you ask men how old they were at the time of
their first sexual experience, the data seems more accurate. Sexual abuse
causes havoc in the lives of boys – in part because of the way in which our
culture differentially responds to boys and girls. Such abuse can
certainly have the impact of gender confusion which contributes to gender
identity which determines sexual orientation….Most of the men that I have
treated over the years have experienced some kind of trauma – some kind of
premature introduction to sexuality either in the form of sexual abuse or some
kind of pornography along with peer abuse.”
Dr James M. Cantor is a professor at the
University of Toronto Faculty of
Medicine Department of
Psychiatry, and one of the world leading experts on paedophilia. His
research concludes that homosexual men are three times more likely than heterosexuals
to molest children. That sounds like a very cautious under-estimate. He says
that a large percentage of pedophiles are homosexual men, usually with adult
partners who become their partners in crime. The number of victims molested by
most male pedophiles is very high, so they commit a high proportion of such
crimes across the population. (http://www.jamescantor.com/)
http://enfantsjustice.wordpress.com/2012/10/14/discredit-scientifique-sans-appel-contre-lhomoparentalite-1-quart-23-des-enfants-abuses-sexuellement/
http://enfantsjustice.wordpress.com/2012/10/14/discredit-scientifique-sans-appel-contre-lhomoparentalite-1-quart-23-des-enfants-abuses-sexuellement/
Hunting the Paedophiles, a Channel 4 Television documentary
broadcast 7th December 2015, revealed that homosexual men are targeting
boys for sexual abuse online all over the world. Investigators discovered as many as 18,000 boy victims aged 10-15, most of them in the UK, being
tricked then blackmailed into providing nude photographs or even videos of
indecent acts.
http://www.standard.co.uk/stayingin/tvfilm/hunting-the-paedophiles-channel-4-documentary-goes-inside-the-national-crime-agency-a3131876.html
In
her book The Death of Right and Wrong (Prima Forum 2003),
ex-lesbian and ex-feminist Tammy
Bruce reveals that many homosexual males were victims of molestation
in their childhood. This includes some of those raped in Dachau by homosexual Nazi
storm troopers. Her view is upheld by an ever-emerging body of evidence. See entries below on McQueen, etc.
It is not the intention of this present book to argue that homosexuality
is caused by childhood abuse, but merely to assemble evidence that male
homosexuals per capita carry out such abuse far more widely than heterosexuals.
Paedophilia is a characteristic of the homosexual mentality, part of the
syndrome, indeed it is typical. An obsession with juveniles is inherent in the homosexual condition. The founders and leaders of the LGBT movement are
predominantly paedophiles. So are many of the so-called academics who now earn
salaries in “gender studies”.
Nevertheless, the
aggressive LGBT movement is getting experts who expose the true facts
blacklisted and dismissed from professional positions. In February
2011, Dr Hans-Christian Raabe was dismissed from the UK Advisory Council
on the Misuse of Drugs for holding ‘embarrassing’ views about homosexuality.
The idea that Raabe’s views were “embarrassing” resulted from an attack in the
blog of homosexual ex-MP Evan Harris, who was still smarting after the shock
loss of his parliamentary seat to a Christian Conservative in 2010. Left-wing
journalists then lynched Raabe, attacking his views on everything because he
was a Christian.
Christian drug expert sacked from Government
advisory panel
By James Slack and Ian Drury
UPDATED: 08:39, 7 February 2011
Highly respected: Dr Raabe says his sacking sets a
dangerous precedent
Home Office officials said he had failed to
disclose being co-author of a study suggesting a link between homosexuality and
paedophilia.
Anti-drugs campaigners described his sacking as an
outrage. Many had welcomed him as a breath of fresh air on the ACMD, which has
repeatedly called for softer attitudes to drugs, such as cannabis and ecstasy.
By contrast Dr Raabe believes that children should be told to ‘say No’, rather
than being told the safest way to consume a banned substance.
Dr Raabe told the Daily Mail: ‘‘My appointment has merely been revoked as a result
of my views on matters completely unrelated to drug policy.’
Dr Raabe was appointed to the ACMD by minister
James Brokenshire on January 10. But he immediately came under attack from
Left-wing newspapers, a BBC internet blog and former members of the ACMD.
Following the criticism, Dr Raabe received a letter
from the Home Office saying it was ‘minded to reconsider’ the appointment.
Today it will confirm he has been sacked from the unpaid, three-year post. The
department said he has been dismissed for failure to disclose a report which
‘raises concerns over his credibility to provide balanced advice on drug misuse
issues’.
The comments on homosexuality and paedophilia attributed to
Dr Raabe were taken from a scientific paper he co-wrote with six other medical
practitioners in 2005. The paper, ‘Gay Marriage’ and Homosexuality: Some
Medical Comments,” drew conclusions from research and studies by other
academics. Using this data Dr Raabe and his colleagues concluded that there is
a ‘disproportionately greater number of homosexuals among paedophiles’ and warn
this is of ‘grave concern’.
Raabe’s paper was published in the prestigious British
Medical Journal in 2005 but they have removed it from their website. http://www.bmj.com/content/341..., The
full text can be read on this website where it was copied http://www.british-israel.ca/gay%20marriage.htm
It presents in cogent and erudite terms the arguments
against same-sex marriage with its concomitant, the adoption of children. The
relevant passage about homosexuality and paedophilia reads, “The number of homosexuals in essentially all
surveys is less than 3%. (Statistics Canada found only 1% of the population who
described themselves as homosexual.) However, the percentage of homosexuals
among pedophiles is 25%. (Blanchard R et al. “Fraternal birth order and sexual
orientation in pedophiles.” Archives of Sexual
Behavior 2000; 29: 463-78.) Therefore, the prevalence of pedophilia
among homosexuals is about 10-25 times higher than one would expect if the
proportion of pedophiles were evenly distributed within the (hetero- and
homosexual) populations.”
The statistics come from The Dunedin Study (Dr Louise
Arsenault 2002). Its conclusions about the links
between homosexuality and paedophilia were considered so well-grounded that its
conclusions were accepted by the British Home Office.
(http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/r... - page 14) But in 2011 the Home Office reversed this decision and has since then
removed the document from its website. The archive is no longer searchable.
The psychological profile of
the adult male homosexual pederast is one of the commonest of all homosexual
types. Many male homosexuals assert that all male homosexuals are inclined to
pederasty. It is certainly true that many of them are. The word “pederasty”,
derived from Greek via Latin and French, arrived in the English language in
1610 and was, together with “sodomy” the usual term for describing inter-male
perversion until the introduction of the word “homosexuality” in 1891. Living
in a relationship with another adult homosexual or even falling in love with
one is no proof that the person is not a pederast. Indeed, they frequently hunt
in pairs. Many male homosexual pederasts are keen to have physical relations
with both adults and boys. Others desire adolescents aged 14-22 – this is
termed ephebephilia. The preference for boys aged 11-14 is hebephilia. Many
homosexuals target boys even younger.
Although this book is called Homosexuality and Paedophilia, what
really emerges from the evidence is a triangular relationship between
homosexuality, paedophilia and the LGBT movement. They are inseparable and
exist in a symbiotic relationship, feeding and being fed by each other.
The LGBT movement has always been from the outset a paedophile movement. This is not, as some apologists claim, a matter of a temporary alliance between two separate movements in the 1970s or 1980s. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26352378) The truth is that they have always been the same people. The “gays” who founded “gay liberation” were paedophiles and a lot of lesbian extremists go along with their views. The powerful international gay-alliance group ILGA, which gets hundreds of millions of euros of public funding per year, was founded by Ian Campbell Dunn, a convicted paedophile offender, and a founding member of the Paedophile Information Exchange. He worked closely with Peter Ashman, another paedophile. The evidence is under their names below.
While today they may hypocritically claim that they have changed and renounced the alliance, all that has happened is a change in terminology. Instead of saying openly that they are paedophiles, they campaign to lower the age of consent. It comes to the same thing. They craftily contrive to go into schools and purge them of “homophobia” or imaginary “gay bullying”. This is a front for recruiting, influencing and accessing young children, many of whom are seduced at LGBT youth groups.
The LGBT movement has always been from the outset a paedophile movement. This is not, as some apologists claim, a matter of a temporary alliance between two separate movements in the 1970s or 1980s. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26352378) The truth is that they have always been the same people. The “gays” who founded “gay liberation” were paedophiles and a lot of lesbian extremists go along with their views. The powerful international gay-alliance group ILGA, which gets hundreds of millions of euros of public funding per year, was founded by Ian Campbell Dunn, a convicted paedophile offender, and a founding member of the Paedophile Information Exchange. He worked closely with Peter Ashman, another paedophile. The evidence is under their names below.
While today they may hypocritically claim that they have changed and renounced the alliance, all that has happened is a change in terminology. Instead of saying openly that they are paedophiles, they campaign to lower the age of consent. It comes to the same thing. They craftily contrive to go into schools and purge them of “homophobia” or imaginary “gay bullying”. This is a front for recruiting, influencing and accessing young children, many of whom are seduced at LGBT youth groups.
Once the law
has accepted the concept of a child’s legal consent, we are into the nightmare
area where any molested child will have to prove that they did not consent. This is bad enough in
cases where a woman is raped. If an adult woman often finds it impossible to
prove that she did not consent, how much harder will it be for a child of 10,
8, 6 or even less? That nightmare is just around the corner.
This book does
not advocate violence, or any illegal harassment of any person. The author
merely believes that laws against child abuse should be enforced using the
official channels. The research is offered simply because we, the public and
the parents, HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW THE TRUTH.
[next installment to follow]
No comments:
Post a Comment